And Flickwick is justified in being angry because you got him involved by convincing him to teach you a dueling spell and then using it illegally, making him an accessory. Pointing out the fact that you were just defending your friends to Snape makes him even angrier, since defending rule breaking with self righteousness is one of his BerserkButtons.But Flickwick, when doing an optional mission (i.e., learning a new spell), talks as though the Player Character DID do something bad and attempts to keep them from partaking in the lesson.Didn't Flitwick point out that the player character was defending themself and others, and Snape brushed it off by pointing out that dueling was against the rules regardless? (Seriously, I don't really remember.) That's hardly making the player character out to be a bad guy, it's just Snape being Snape.Why does the game still have the Player Character Made Out to Be a Jerkass to Flikwick for dueling The Bully even when one of the dialogue options could have the Player state they were fighting in self-defense? Or better yet, why does the school still hate the Player, even when there were witnesses who could attest to The Bully starting the fight?. I'm not sure if Tonks ever even mentioned knowing Charlie in the books, and the only interaction she had with Bill I recall is the mistaken Shipper on Deck situation, despite them being canon characters, so it is reasonable for them to not mention other classmates either.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |